🔗 Share this article

In a significant legal reversal, the Australian classification review board has overturned a prior decision that blocked viewers in Australia from accessing video footage of the violent event involving influencer Charlie Kirk. The appeal was initiated by Elon Musk's company X, which contested an order sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Background on the Case and Ban

Following the death of Charlie Kirk at a US campus in last year, the regulator applied to the classification board to officially classify the available footage. The board first determined the content was "refused classification", a rating that allowed the regulator to order platforms to restrict access to the videos for an Australian audience.

The platform X challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. It also appealed a comparable ban on a separate video—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "unacceptable for distribution".

The Platform's Case and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X asserted that the footage in question contained only a short moment of violence with the weapon not shown. The company noted the footage was grainy and the camera quickly panned away from the individual to the bystanders.

The social media giant maintained the footage was not excessively detailed, gratuitous, or offensive, stating it served as a factual documentation of "a significant incident of public importance that generated widespread discussion". X even compared the footage and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the classification panel concluded that, "notwithstanding the heinous nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was exploitative, gratuitous, or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. However, they noted that a more detailed depiction with different editing might have met that threshold. As a result, the board changed the rating of the content to R18+.

A Dissenting Viewpoint

A minority on the panel disagreed, contending the video was "a shareable video for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". They also argued the parallel with the JFK assassination tape was flawed, as the Kennedy video was made public long after the assassination, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Reactions to the Outcome

In a statement on its official policy channel, the platform welcomed the ruling.

"We challenged this case to defend free speech and the importance of public access about matters of public significance. Our commitment remains dedicated to safeguarding these fundamental values."

A spokesperson for the eSafety commissioner also welcomed the ruling, but pointed out that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "must take steps to ensure R18+ material is not accessible to Australians under 18".

Broader Context on Sensitive Footage

Separately, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to social media companies this week regarding disturbing videos from the Sydney beach incident shared across social media. Officials commented that while the content were upsetting, they had not met the high threshold for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, the companies have been instructed to apply warning labels and screens, such as blurring, on this material in line with their own content policies.